Thursday, May 2, 2013

I wrote this opinion in response to some threads on Google+ that immediately followed the shutdown of Boston while the various law enforcement agencies conducted house to house searches for the Boston bombers.  Finding the bomber in someone's back yard, the question arose about whether or not the Bostonians would have wanted to own a firearm while the terrorist ran amuck.

Whether or not a Bostonian wanted an assault rifle during their siege is irrelevant.  What is completely relevant however is the fact that it is not any of Dianne Feinstein's business.  If she is comfortable without one in the same situation, then it would be her choice not to buy one and have it on hand.  To deny another the opportunity to feel secure is to deny that which is rightfully theirs: Life, Liberty, and Property.

No comments:

Post a Comment